Regardless of what the Oracle said, I have reproducible data to show that read cache is not good for sequential reads. I'm not claiming this is univerally true, but I have observed it in my own tests.
↧
Channel:
Storage Performance for SQL Server
X
Are you the publisher?
Claim or
contact us
about this channel.
X
0
Channel Details:
- Title: Storage Performance for SQL Server
- Channel Number: 5589646
- Language: English
- Registered On: November 22, 2012, 7:17 am
- Number of Articles: 24
- Latest Snapshot: August 20, 2015, 11:23 pm
- RSS URL: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/commentrss.aspx?postid=5437
- Publisher: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/2008/03/04/storage-performance-for-sql-server.aspx
- Description: There is a perplexing lack of material on overall storage performance strategy for database...
- Catalog: //narrowly126.rssing.com/catalog.php?indx=5589646
© 2025 //www.rssing.com